I read in prorpio questi giorni alcuni articoli interessanti e considerazioni sullo stato attuale delle Rete e sulle politiche future: inoltre in rete si rincorrono notizie, le più disparate, anche allarmanti, su quale sarà il suo futuro.
Vorrei soffermarmi però su di una analisi personale su punti e principi, alcuni già realizzati altri meno, che caratterizzano la rete attuale, operando allo stesso tempo un'analisi sulla situazione allo stato dell'arte:
1) facilità di utilizzo dello strumento informatico (eccessiva facilità anche di copia); problema del "falso"(fake) o della falsificazione sempre in agguato;
2) dato informatico altamente dinamico e passibile di modifiche e copie (anche non autorizzate), what distinguishes it from the old paper-based data (analog) given its intangible
3) Freedom of access to the network but still a fee (not yet realized, given that most ISPs provide supplies and services fee: the digital divide is also a problem of infrastructure in Italy) and the network is then democratic, anyone can use and access to it;
4) Equality in access to the network: each is guaranteed access, regardless of other conditions or subjective status ;
5) Freedom in the use of the service: Anyone is free to use the internet for what pleases him most, always within the limits of the law;
6) Privacy, right of action on the network within the law "without being monitored or spied upon" you can not monitor the content of users' internet surfing, slalvo exceptions, but only traffic. I wonder if it still exists in the Privacy particular areas such as social networking, as users share their own initiative their own habits and personal information, then Internet traffic is mostly clear (some exceptions), however, hesitate tools (for the most advanced user) to ensure the confidentiality and access to information;
7) Principle of non-locality of the network: the network is almost everywhere, it's redundant, is accessible regardless of the place is full of PoF to support their operation in the event of a fall of some nodes;
8) Quantity of the information network ("too much information to be checked"): the large amount of data prevents the proper management and control capillary
9) Quality of information (certification of the information, accuracy of the sources): anyone can write a contribution on any platform (wiki, blog, etc. ..) from non-technical matters;
10) Provenance certain Information: It is not yet a reliable tool for identification in the network, but there are several tools (digital certificates) which ensure the provenance and authorship of the data;
11) Knowledge for everyone (with the downside of that malware or computer crimes are easily achievable even by a user does not own appraiser);
12) reviews and criticism easily detectable: l ' economics and marketing if they really free benefit, since they are easy to detect the pinion soggettivedegli users
13) trend of Eternity information (there is a right to oblivion?) suits the information passed is always potentially available on the network;
14) criticism and opinions easily expressible, and this leads to an enlargement of the different opinions, but also more critical;
15) New "professions" to change position on the instrument, but also widening of the platform of the authors (frankly, nowadays anyone can express their art form ripsetto easily at first and possibly less fit);
16) Problem of greater selectivity and information content (given by the enormous amount of material available);
17) Increased dissemination of ideas and creativity of the users;
18) the last but not least , L ' Use of the network: the "goodness" of the network depends on your use if it is in practice so far are the statistics to give us guidance in this regard;
Censorship is inherently incompatible with the tool, which should operate as a sort of filter information and then make a selection upstream damaging many of the points mentioned above. I do not believe that the preventive control is a viable option, but a dangerous threshold for democracy for all and for the circulation of ideas.
last question, but the network is neutral? now the answer is no, as there is logic of the market very urgent by large groups.
These are just a reflection of the items on which to base future decisions on future considerations set that the system will do: therefore we welcome further consideration, reviews and criticism.
Vorrei soffermarmi però su di una analisi personale su punti e principi, alcuni già realizzati altri meno, che caratterizzano la rete attuale, operando allo stesso tempo un'analisi sulla situazione allo stato dell'arte:
1) facilità di utilizzo dello strumento informatico (eccessiva facilità anche di copia); problema del "falso"(fake) o della falsificazione sempre in agguato;
2) dato informatico altamente dinamico e passibile di modifiche e copie (anche non autorizzate), what distinguishes it from the old paper-based data (analog) given its intangible
3) Freedom of access to the network but still a fee (not yet realized, given that most ISPs provide supplies and services fee: the digital divide is also a problem of infrastructure in Italy) and the network is then democratic, anyone can use and access to it;
4) Equality in access to the network: each is guaranteed access, regardless of other conditions or subjective status ;
5) Freedom in the use of the service: Anyone is free to use the internet for what pleases him most, always within the limits of the law;
6) Privacy, right of action on the network within the law "without being monitored or spied upon" you can not monitor the content of users' internet surfing, slalvo exceptions, but only traffic. I wonder if it still exists in the Privacy particular areas such as social networking, as users share their own initiative their own habits and personal information, then Internet traffic is mostly clear (some exceptions), however, hesitate tools (for the most advanced user) to ensure the confidentiality and access to information;
7) Principle of non-locality of the network: the network is almost everywhere, it's redundant, is accessible regardless of the place is full of PoF to support their operation in the event of a fall of some nodes;
8) Quantity of the information network ("too much information to be checked"): the large amount of data prevents the proper management and control capillary
9) Quality of information (certification of the information, accuracy of the sources): anyone can write a contribution on any platform (wiki, blog, etc. ..) from non-technical matters;
10) Provenance certain Information: It is not yet a reliable tool for identification in the network, but there are several tools (digital certificates) which ensure the provenance and authorship of the data;
11) Knowledge for everyone (with the downside of that malware or computer crimes are easily achievable even by a user does not own appraiser);
12) reviews and criticism easily detectable: l ' economics and marketing if they really free benefit, since they are easy to detect the pinion soggettivedegli users
13) trend of Eternity information (there is a right to oblivion?) suits the information passed is always potentially available on the network;
14) criticism and opinions easily expressible, and this leads to an enlargement of the different opinions, but also more critical;
15) New "professions" to change position on the instrument, but also widening of the platform of the authors (frankly, nowadays anyone can express their art form ripsetto easily at first and possibly less fit);
16) Problem of greater selectivity and information content (given by the enormous amount of material available);
17) Increased dissemination of ideas and creativity of the users;
18) the last but not least , L ' Use of the network: the "goodness" of the network depends on your use if it is in practice so far are the statistics to give us guidance in this regard;
Censorship is inherently incompatible with the tool, which should operate as a sort of filter information and then make a selection upstream damaging many of the points mentioned above. I do not believe that the preventive control is a viable option, but a dangerous threshold for democracy for all and for the circulation of ideas.
last question, but the network is neutral? now the answer is no, as there is logic of the market very urgent by large groups.
These are just a reflection of the items on which to base future decisions on future considerations set that the system will do: therefore we welcome further consideration, reviews and criticism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment